The following Documents pertain to the Leased Apartment and Apartment contents.

600 Numbers are Post Trial Filings

900 Numbers are for Deeds

Form 2 and Form 9 Settlement Documents and appraisals

The following documents are the Form 2 and Form 9 Versions prepared by the attorneys. The final version submitted to the court on day of trial was prepared by Brandi Smith Ward, and submitted by Rudy Arambulo. I did not see that version until we were in hallway of court on day of trial. I immediately told my lawyer that this document is not what we had prepared and all the numbers and asset allocations were wrong. He told me not to worry Judge would go over each item and correct it. When I opposed the numbers Judge admonished me and so did Rudy Arambulo. They both told me I could not change figures because I changed my mind. I told them these were not my figures and I don’t know where they came from. I have most transcripts from trial and hearings and all recordings. Judge went off record numerous times.

COMPLAINTS FILED AND RESPONSES

This group of Documents include the original complaint I filed with the Commission on Retirement, Removal and Discipline of Judges and Responses I received

Here are some of my grievances. This will be updated. First appearance before Judge Eighmy, he ordered me not only out of my house, but out of the state. This prevented me from having meetings with my attorney, who made numerous mistakes. Had I been here, I might have prevented some of those mistakes. He ordered me out of my home and out of state with o hearing, no Due Process.

Judge ordered appraisals. John lied on appraisals. Even with john’s lies, Judge awarded John items and charged him less than appraised values. Many items he awarded me, he raised the appraised values. When I tried to tell them that many items were mine before I married John, or many items listed by John just did not exist, or Many items were ridiculously overvalued by John, I was shut down.

During the trial, he admonished me if I tried to answer questions. Numerous times I told the court that the documents they were using was not my documents, and the items and figures were not ones I gave to my attorney. Rudy Arambulo and Judge Eighmy kept accusing me of trying to change my figures. I kept telling them these were not my documents. During post trial hearings, It came out that the documents that were presented during hearings and trial, were not my documents and did not reflect any of my figures. Judge Eighmy accepted a copy of a corrected Form 9 from my attorney during post trial hearing. He refused to use the document in his settlement figures. He based his settlement on documents that contained numerous lies, inflation of figures, and containing many items that did not exist. The commission who received this complaint found no misconduct in office, no willful failure for Judge to perform his duties, no violations of his actions. The commission never contacted me regarding this complaint. It appears they used docket entries for the basis of their decision. However, even the docket entry made by the judge should have been enough to review the rest of my complaint. Judge says right in first docket entry that he ordered me out of my home and out of state without a hearing. No Due Process.

Laws violated by Judge Eighmy.

John was never on the deed to my house in NJ. I paid for that house and used that money to buy my home in MO. Missouri State Statute 452.330.1 and other statutes and laws should protect people from judges taking away your home. Statutes, laws and evidence of misconduct in office will follow.

John’s lawyer could not produce a deed on my NJ house showing he ever had ownership. I provided deeds showing I bought and owned that house with my first husband. Then I bought him out of that house. I sold that house and put $143,000 down on NJ house, paid for both boat slips and all moving expenses.

Missouri State Statute 452.325.1

All property acquired subsequent to marriage taken in joint names is marital property subject to division upon dissolution unless (1) it is shown that such property was acquired in exchange for property acquired prior to the marriage, and (2) it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the transfer was not intended as a provision for a settlement upon or as a gift to the other spouse.  Conrad v. Bowers (A.), 533 S.W.2d 614.

This group of Documents contain original complaint filed against Dan Brogdon and various other communication regarding the complaint.

The Judge ordered Copies of the original Form 2 of all parties to be submitted to court. This document is where it became known that Dan Brogdon and submitted false, misleading and/or fraudulent documents. John’s both attorneys accepted these false documents from my attorney and prepared more false documents and submitted them to the court. When we all went back to court for post trial hearings the judge was informed that the documents he had received were fraudulent and that I had no knowledge of where the figures on those documents came from. He disregarded the corrected documents that he had received from my attorney during the post trial hearings and continued to make his judgment based on the false documents. I believe the three attorneys involved made this happen. If any one of the three attorneys came forward and admitted what they all had done I believe I would have been awarded my house. The three attorneys declared a leased apartment as real estate. No one could produce a deed. They all had a copy of my lease. It was entered into evidence. However all three attorneys proceeded to declared it real estate. Judge declared it real estate. I had my contents of the apartment appraised. About $1,345. John and his attorneys changed their figures several times til they got to $26,335. Judge accepted their changed figures and said $26,335 for apartment contents. He completely disregarded the appraisal he ordered.

This group of Documents contain the complaint and responses regarding Brandi Smith

I filed this complaint against Brandi Smith. She prepared and submitted false documents to the court. In the response from the OCD it appears they review docket entries and render a decision. They did not contact me for additional documentation or information. They asked what I did. I did what I thought was appropriate and filed a complaint. Their recommendation was to get a lawyer. So does that constitute how the actions of lawyers and judges are reviewed for misconduct? I testified in court that the documents were wrong. I tried to tell the judge other things also but was told I could only directly answer questions and not expand on my answers. So during the court appearances, I did what I could to try and get the truth on record. I don’t know what else I could have done.

Brandi Smith prepared documents based on and included lies. She then submitted those false documents to the court. When it came time for my husband John Russwurm and her to prepare the settlement documents, they were broadly fraudulent. Then she withdrew as his attorney and Rudy Arambulo took over the case and he submitted the false documents. So one attorney prepared false document, a second attorney submits false documents to the court. Judge accepts all the false documents or no documents at all and renders his decision. And I did testify in court that the documents were not correct and I had never seen the settlement figures until 10 minutes before we were in court. Rudy Arambulo gave the documents to my attorney in the hall of the court 10 minutes before trial was to start. I immediately told my lawyer these were not the documents we had prepared for trial and none of the figures on the document were correct. In post trial hearings it became evident that the judge had false, fraudulent and/or misleading documents presented to him during the hearings and trial. During post trail hearings he accepted corrected documents from my new attorney. However he chose to render his decision on the incorrect documents he had accepted during the trial and hearings.

During the trial and hearings, even though Brandi Smith had withdrawn a my husband’s attorney, she was in court almost every time. During times when judge went off record she approached the judge and they had private conversations. After the trial when I was in Rudy Arambulo’s office, Judge Eighmy called Arambulo. He told the judge I was in his office and immediately ended the call.

This group of Documents contain the complaint and related Documents to Rudy Arambulo

Miscellaneous Documents

Following Pages will corroborate the filing of false, fraudulent, and/or misleading documents during the entire divorce process

The three cards I received from John show we were still together thru 2014. It will also show he mailed me a Christmas Card in 2012, when he left me in NJ to spend Christmas with his girlfriend.